The mother and the step-father were just given life sentences with a minimum of 30 years in prison before being eligible for parole. Parole? Really? They took a little innocent boy's life, and they could possibly be eligible for parole in 30 years? How can the courts justify this? How could they have the possibility of walking free in 30 years after having supposedly 'paid their dues' for their crimes? How is a little innocent boy's life only worth 30 years in prison? And how is it 'life in prison' essentially may only be 30 years?
Baby P, Alfie Goddard, Amy Howson, Khyra Ishaq, Victoria Climbe, and countless others died at the hands of those who should have protected them. Why do cases such as these reoccur again and again? How does Social Services fail so many times? What makes it so hard to realize that these are strikingly obvious cases of child abuse? Why are children like these still being failed by everyone? Why is it always the most innocent and vulnerable who are the subject of brutality?
These questions may never be answered, and will likely be discussed again and again as more cases like these appear in the news. And I dread they day it does.
A sobering, but important post.
ReplyDelete